It is and it isn't

The prospect of science actually testing theories and hypotheses that are investigating the possibility of multiple dimensions, not only separate from, but in conjunction to our own is exciting. I, for one, am not so quick to dismiss their propositions. In fact I really want the scientific community to find evidence and make great endeavors into to that arena. I am pleased to see us inquiring into multiple areas and of not being intimidated into sticking with "safe" ideas. It is when we take bold strides that the most change can occur.
I sat up for a while after finishing my dissection of the Charlie Rose interview with Lisa Randall. With my mind boggled I attempted to make cohesive sense of what I had just heard and try to add something of my own to the theory. Randall spoke of dimensions with a brane where gravity is great and therefore the matter is highly condensed and one such as our own where its force is far weaker giving way to the spaciousness inherent here. These are examples of varied degrees creating an balance on the whole by way of minor instabilities. I think in terms of something similar to an accordion; so what expands out into parallels like linear modules it also expands above and below into the macro and micro of our own world. In that case the dimensions would also be seen here, and in my opinion they can be. There are the allusions to solid and condensed objects (higher gravity) like planets and within them are the spacious worlds of elements (lower gravitational force), then say for instance a person as the next illusion of a compacted mass and within them an existence of spacely atoms, etc., etc. These are all basically an observation of patterns and orders that are prevalent (another example of this is a book as a cohesive whole, then it's broken down into chapters, then pages, paragraphs, phrases, sentences, words, letters, and finally space which then again takes up the majority of the book; so the whole is really held together through it being empty). Abstractly what we are doing is extending our genetic code our life force; propagating it with expansive ideas such as these as we extend our reach to further and further out. Overall, it is exciting to see what our interests will yield, however the imagination with which it is filled is also greatly predictable because it is based upon our existing spiraling helix of a pattern.
One last comment, if we are not creating existence and the whole of reality through the life, extended touch (projection) of our genetic code then we are at least interpreting all of existence through it; so we are either clearly seeing everything or we will only be privy to that fragment of the code of existence of which we are apart.